When estimating future cost and performance levels an understanding of current performance relative to relevant comparators is important.  A key aspect of this understanding will be a view on how the Infracos are performing both relative to each other and also when compared with other similar industries or rail networks.  The Arbiter's approach to benchmarking will enable these comparisons to be drawn.

 

International benchmarking:
The costs and performance of maintaining and renewing metro systems.
16 March 2010
Download PDF (1.3 Mb)

International benchmarking of the costs and performance of maintaining and renewing systems
Additional Data Study, BSL, May 2009
1 June 2009
Download PDF (330.1 Kb)

International benchmarking of the costs and performance of maintaining and renewing metro systems
Final report, BSL, January 2009
13 January 2009
Download PDF (943.8 Kb)

Benchmarking of Administration and Overhead Costs for a Periodic Review
Stage One Report - Oxera
15 January 2008
Download PDF (197.2 Kb)

Proposed approach to benchmarking of the indirect, programme management
and central costs of the Infracos during a Periodic Review
14 September 2007
Download PDF (359.4 Kb)

Review of Joint Benchmarking
Report on general approach and Periodic Review
8 August 2007
Download PDF (962.5 Kb)

Benchmarking of Track Maintenance and Renewal Costs, Stage 1 - Concept
Lloyd's Register Rail
1 June 2007
Download PDF (587.6 Kb)

High Level Efficiency - Final Report, 2006
Nera Economic Consultancy
15 June 2006
Download PDF (397.2 Kb)

Internal Benchmarking - Stage 1 Final Report
PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC)
23 August 2005
Download PDF (657.7 Kb)

Benchmarking Efficiency & Performance
Cambridge Economic Policy Associates (CEPA)
1 July 2003
Download PDF (1.7 Mb)

 


BACK TO THE TOP